Title: COMPASSIONATE DOCTORS -- OR -- NAZI DOCTORS?
Resources to aid your Understanding |
"The New Genocide of Handicapped And Afflicted People" by Dr. Wolfensberger "The Illuminati Is Fulfilling Biblical Prophecy" - DVD by Doc Marquis "Lucifer's Conspiracy and Spiritual Warfare" - New DVD by Pastor Hoggard
|
Learn how to protect yourself, your loved ones!
Stand by for insights so startling you will never look at the news the same way again.
YOU ARE NOW ON
THE CUTTING EDGE
Copyright © 2004 Cutting Edge Ministries. All rights reserved. See full copyright notice below.
NEWS BRIEF: "Doctor's Prescription - euthanasia survey", November 1, 2002
"... by a 2-to-1 margin, rank-and-file doctors were less likely to oppose assisted suicide than were delegates to the American Medical Association. The poll surveyed 1,320 doctors - 930 rank-and-file and 390 AMA delegates - and had a response rate of 71 percent. Forty-five percent of non-delegate doctors favored legalization of assisted suicide ... Compared with physicians who are delegates to the American Medical Association, nearly twice as many rank-and-file doctors favor assisted suicide."
NEWS BRIEF: "One in five nurses in survey admits helping a patient die", The Providence Journal Bulletin, May 23, 1996, Page A-1, A-12.
"Nearly one in five nurses who care for critically ill adults have cause a patient's death either through euthanasia or assisted suicide, according to a national survey. The nurses said they often acted at the request of the patient, but 7 percent said they acted on their own. While the nation debates the legality and morality of assisted suicide and euthanasia, the new survey adds to the evidence that such practices are already going on in America's hospitals."
Two factors jump out by comparing this 2002 report with the 1996 news story:
1) Is seems logical that the pro-euthanasia attitude of the practicing, "hands-on" medical people working in hospitals, nursing homes, and hospice centers has dramatically jumped from 20% in 1996 to 45% in 2002. I know one news story reports the attitude of nurses while the other reports the attitude of doctors, but our research indicates that these two groups closely parallel each other in their attitudes, which is not surprising, since they work together daily.
2) In the 1996 report, 7% of the nurses admitted they "acted on their own" to kill their patients! This statistic is staggering, and if this number has dramatically increased since 1996, Dr. Wolfensberger is correct when he states that our medical establishment is killing more people per year than Adolf Hitler killed during the entire Holocaust. [Dr. Wolf Wolfensberger, "The New Genocide of Handicapped And Afflicted People"]
Statistics seem parallel in Great Britain.
NEWS BRIEF: "Sometimes a Small Victory: Research by the University of Glasgow into Physician Assisted Suicide"
"Major new academic study concludes that arguments in favour of physician assisted suicide outweigh those against ... In a separate, postal survey of UK medical practitioners and pharmacists, 54% were in favour of a change in the law to allow physician-assisted suicide to take place in specific circumstances, with only 36% against ... most medical practitioners found physician-assisted suicide preferable to voluntary euthanasia (43% in comparison to 19%) ..."
This last statistic is simply appalling, for doctors have always subscribed to the Hippocratic Oath, which, in its classical version, prohibits the killing of patients -- for any reason. Let us review this classical oath:
"I will apply dietetic measures for the benefit of the sick according to my ability and judgment; I will keep them from harm and injustice.
I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect. Similarly I will not give to a woman an abortive remedy. In purity and holiness I will guard my life and my art."
If the Ancient Greeks understand the genocidal nature of "physican-assisted suicide", then why is modern man so intent upon gaining the power to kill instead of to heal? At this End of the Age, we believe a devilish spirit is sweeping the globe, intent upon staging the Masonic Christ on the world scene and to implement his vision of death to 66% of all mankind. Adolf Hitler was a type of Antichrist, driven by a hellish spirit which swept Germany from 1890-1945, producing the Nazi Holocaust in which 18 million "devalued people" were systematically murdered.
These articles are shocking in their moral implications for America's National attitudes toward the Sanctity of Human Life. Americans have traditionally held to the Christian viewpoint, the standard that said all human life is God Given and only God can end it. Americans have never accepted the viewpoint that someone else, no matter how "sincere" they might be, can decide when and how a person may have their life ended. So, this information represents a tremendous change in the moral attitudes of a significant proportion of American nurses.
But, there is more, so much more than this moral focus, as important as that might be. Rather, I see two very important New World Order issues at work:
1. Attitudes of individual American nurses are on a strong parallel to the attitude of German nurses from 1920-1935, attitudes which allowed Hitler to begin his Holocaust.
2. This story illustrates how very effective the Six
Step Attitudinal Change Plan has been, in this instance, in changing
America's long held view concerning human euthanasia.
Let us examine now Paragraph #1, above. "Attitudes of individual American nurses are on a strong parallel to the attitude of German nurses from 1920-1935, attitudes which allowed Hitler to begin his Holocaust." I have made the point repeatedly that America is leading the world into the New World Order, a total system of Government, Economy, and Religion exactly like the system Hitler set up from 1933-1938. Since this is true, it is highly significant that a strong proportion of American nurses (and probably doctors) have arrived at the same moral point of view towards their patients that German nurses and doctors held prior to Hitler coming to power (1920-1933).
We will be quoting from a book entitled, "Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide", by Robert Jay Lifton, 1986.
Dr. Lifton made a gruesome discovery when he was researching the Nazi Holocaust: The massive murder campaign, which lasted for 7 years and eradicated 18 million people, including 6 million Jews, was directed, from beginning to end, by German doctors. (P. 4) Before this discovery Dr. Lifton considered the participation of the German medical community to be limited only to the infamous medical "experiments", which had received much publicity. But, Dr. Lifton made another discovery:
Without the participation of doctors and nurses in the Holocaust, Hitler would never have been able to kill as he did!
How is this possible? How could the Germany of Martin Luther, the Christian Reformer, become the Germany of Adolf Hitler, the madman? Were the German nurses and doctors that served Hitler so well crazy, or demonic? Dr. Lifton's answer, after interviewing many of them, was "No, they were not demonic ." (p. 5)
The most disturbing factor, to Dr. Lifton, was that they were quite ordinary people. Dr. Lifton concluded, "... ordinary people can commit demonic acts." (P. 5) Dr. Lifton later stated this terrible situation in yet another way, "Repeatedly, in this study, I describe banal men performing demonic acts ... My goal in this study is to uncover psychological conditions conducive to evil." (P. 12)
Dr. Lifton discovered that the chronicle of this terrible story began many years before Hitler gained power in 1933. In 1883, Sir Francis Galton, author of "Hereditary Genius" (1869), coined the term "Eugenics to denote the principle of strengthening a biological group on the basis of ostensible hereditary worth ..." (P. 24) Throughout the Western World, many physicians discussed the relative pros and cons of Eugenics. Many people were sterilized according to Eugenics. But, Dr. Lifton notes, "only in Nazi Germany was sterilization a forerunner of mass murder... the German version of Eugenics had a characteristic tone of romantic excess, as in Lenz's earlier [1917] declaration ... that 'race was the criterion of value', and 'the State is not there to see that the individual gets his rights, but only to serve the state.' Lenz understood his advocacy to be one of 'organic socialism' and feared that, without a radical eugenics project, 'our Nordic race is doomed to extinction.'" (P. 24)
But, as terrible as sterilization was, it was the tip of the iceberg. The really effective precursor to the Holocaust was the emphasis in Germany upon human euthanasia, a movement which can be traced back to the "last decade of the nineteenth century". (P. 46) A German 'ethical' theorist, Adolf Jost, issued a call for direct medical killing in 1895, in a book entitled, "The Right To Death" (Ibid.) Jost argued that control over the death of an individual must ultimate belong to the ... state ... Jost was pointing to the state's right to kill" ... [Jost argued], "The rights to death are the key to the fitness of life. The state must own death -- must kill -- in order to keep the social organism alive and healthy." (Ibid.)
But, the key work which uniquely pushed Germany into Hitler's Holocaust was published in 1920, called "The Permission To Destroy Life Unworthy Of Life". The German authors "stressed the therapeutic goal of that concept: destroying life unworthy of life is 'purely a healing treatment and a healing work'." (Ibid.)
Remember this phrase: "a healing treatment and a healing work"
In all Adult Euthanasia cases, 'healing becomes killing' and 'killing provides healing' in the mind of the medical staff!
These German authors explored the "doctor's legal responsibility in 'death assistance' and the 'killing of the consenting participant'... He advocated a carefully controlled juridical process, with applications for killing evaluated by a three-person panel (a general physician, a psychiatrist, and a lawyer). A patient who had given his consent to be killed would have the right to withdraw that consent at any time, but there was also an emphasis on the legal protection of physicians involved in the killing process ... Hoche ... insisted that such a policy of killing was compassionate and consistent with medical ethics ..." (P. 47)
Germany, as of this policy paper in 1920, was on the slippery slope toward mass killing, a slope that ended in the horrific ravine of Hitler's Holocaust two decades later.
This paper touched off a firestorm of debate within the German medical community. The majority view was horrified at the thesis of this radical paper, and they spoke out against it vigorously. Dr. Lifton reported that, "during the years prior to the Nazi assumption of power, their thesis was by no means a majority view in German psychiatry and medicine." (P. 48)
Therefore, when Hitler took power in 1933, only a minority of German doctors and nurses held to this radical view of human euthanasia; yet, Hitler was able to galvanize this minority into action to transform his entire nation into the killing machine that would systematically kill 6 million Jews and 12 million other "undesirables". Once Hitler assumed power in 1933, he found a significant minority of doctors and nurses killing patients, either with the patient's permission, or secretly -- misapplying medical technology, i.e., giving too strong a dosage.
Hitler then threw the resources and authority of the Federal Government behind this ongoing policy of euthanasia. The State propaganda machine began to prepare the German people to agree that the Government had a "responsibility" to make life-and-death decisions for its citizenry. Several films were created that powerfully supported this thesis. One of them proved to be exceedingly powerful, entitled "I Accuse". This film depicted "a physician giving a lethal injection to his incurable ill wife in response to her desperate plea that he do so to relieve her of her terrible pain and suffering." (P. 49) The physician was arrested for murder and brought to trial. A sympathetic jury member stated emphatically that "the most important precondition is that the patient wants it". (Ibid.)
But, the real message of the film, and one that came through loudly and clearly, was that "an exception to that 'voluntary' principle should be made for the mentally ill, where 'the state must take over the responsibility.' " (Ibid.) Many German doctors, interviewed by Dr. Lifton well after the war ended, mentioned the impact this film had had on their minds.
This one sentence of the film, that "an exception to that 'voluntary' principle should be made for the mentally ill, where 'the state must take over the responsibility.' " opened the door of outright prohibition against the formerly disgusting practice of human euthanasia. Once this door was opened, Hitler's propaganda machine was able to daily push it open more and more, until killing was being carried out very openly, with millions of people either participating or acquiescing. Hitler cleverly utilized a well thought out Plan that gradually changes a person's attitude or value about any particular subject, in this case, human euthanasia, without that person ever being aware that they are being manipulated to make the change. Therefore, when that person(s) does change to the new position, a position he had hated before, he does not realize that he has been manipulated. His new position seems very "normal" to him, and he thinks he has arrived at this new attitude or value entirely on his own. I call this Plan the Six-Step Attitudinal Change Plan, and I see its use in so many instances in society today.
This is how the Six-Step Attitudinal Change Plan works:
Step 1. Some practice so offensive that it can scarcely be discussed in public is advocated by a RESPECTED expert in a RESPECTED forum.
Step 2. At first, the public is shocked, then outraged.
Step 3. But, the VERY FACT that such a thing could be publicly debated becomes the SUBJECT of the debate.
Step 4. In the process, sheer repetition of the shocking subject under discussion gradually dulling its effect.
Step 5. People then are no longer shocked by the subject.
Step 6. No longer outraged, people begin to argue for positions to moderate the extreme; or, they accept the premise, challenging, instead, the means to ACHIEVE it.
Let us examine how this 6-Step Plan worked in Germany, to prepare a significant minority of the German people to accept human euthanasia.
Step 1. A practice so offensive that it can scarcely be discussed in public is advocated by a RESPECTED expert in a RESPECTED forum.
a. In 1895, a medical ethicist, Adolf Jost advocated human euthanasia, in his book "The Right To Death". Jost was the RESPECTED 'expert' and his book was the RESPECTED 'forum'.
b. In 1920, two "distinguished German professors" (P. 46), Karl Binding and Alfred Hoche issued their "crucial work" (Ibid) "The Permission To Destroy Life Unworthy of Life". The distinguished German professors were the RESPECTED 'experts' and their University thesis was the RESPECTED 'forum'.
Step 2. At first, the public is shocked, then outraged. The majority view of the German medical profession quickly and firmly wrote against this terrible, tragic idea.
Step 3. But, the VERY FACT that such a thing could be publicly debated becomes the SUBJECT of the debate. Invisibly, the focus of the debate shifted from the merits of human euthanasia, and toward the concept that, at least, society was getting this subject out in the open where it can be fairly debated. Fierce debate ensued!
Step 4. In the process, sheer repetition of the shocking subject under discussion gradually dulling its effect. Gradually, invisibly, many people began to drift toward the deadly center, away from their original "firm" position against euthanasia.
Now, their minds were prepared for the killing blow to the German psyche.
Step 5. People then are no longer shocked by the subject. Once a person is no longer shocked by the formerly taboo subject, he allows himself to look at it more often. Many people who look at a formerly taboo subject find themselves drawn inexorably toward it. Too many of these people began to be "more open" about the subject.
The stage is now set for the final trap door to be sprung.
Step 6. No longer outraged, people begin to argue for positions to moderate the extreme; or, they accept the premise, challenging, instead, the means to ACHIEVE it. Some "brilliant" person steps forward in the public debate, asking for both sides to compromise their positions. They advocate the acceptance of the formerly taboo subject, which satisfies the "Radical Reform" position; however, this acceptance is initially proposed to be under very, very strict guidelines, a "modest" proposal that even the most hard-core proponents against the taboo can hardly argue against. Thus, compromise occurs, allowing the door to be swung open just a crack, allowing the formerly taboo subject to be practiced under the most severely restricting circumstances. The proponents of allowing the taboo to be openly practice object strenuously in public, but are cheering their victory in private. The proponents of maintaining the taboo "congratulate" themselves on preventing an even greater tragedy, not realizing that their compromise is simply "delayed defeat".
In Germany, initial human euthanasia was legally permitted only in very restricted circumstances, and only with the permission of the patient who "wanted to die". To ensure that no illegal action could be taken, a panel of professionals was set up to review each case. But, in only a few years, this door was kicked wide open, degree by degree, until Hitler could openly kill anyone he wanted for any reason.
And, oh yes, the German Government changed the laws, so that a doctor who practiced human euthanasia was acting legally.
Can any of you see that the case of Terris Schiavo occurred according to this Six-Step Attitudinal Change Plan? Last week, we discussed this subject in great detail. Terri's sad case is publicly leading the charge to kick this door wide open in America, and following the German example very closely.
But, this situation shows how far down the German road to Holocaust our American doctors and nurses have traveled. Yes, they represent only a small fraction of the total population of doctors and nurses in America, but the German doctors and nurses who practiced human euthanasia was only a fraction of the whole! A determined political leader wanting to force wholesale changes only needs a significant minority proportion of the population to agree with his position. He can force his changes based upon that minority, knowing that, with governmental authority suddenly thrown behind the minority, the majority will be forced into compliance.
How far is this killing occurring in America today? Let us examine the statistics in this Providence Journal-Bulletin article. Of the 852 nurses who answered the anonymous questionnaire:
1) 342 nurses (40%) admitted that "they had, at times, wanted to engage in euthanasia but had not." (P. A-12) These people would be willing participants in human euthanasia once the Government legalizes it!
2) 129 nurses (15%) admitted that "they had hastened a patient's death through euthanasia or assisted suicide". (Ibid) These people would probably be selected as leaders of the new Euthanasia movement!
3) 35 nurses (4%) admitted that "they had hastened death by only pretending to provide life-sustaining treatment ordered by a doctor".! (Ibid)
Admitting that there may be some statistical spillover, especially in the last two categories you still had, potentially, 59% of nurses in this country who were sympathetic to human euthanasia 1996!! By goodness, does America have pre-Hitler's Germany beaten in the numbers of medical people who are sympathetic to human euthanasia?
Let us look at one expert who clearly thinks so.
Professor Wolf Wolfensberger is the Director, at Syracuse University, of the Division of Special Education & Rehabilitation, Leadership, & Change Agentry. Professor Wolfensberger has written a book manuscript entitled, "The New Genocide of Handicapped And Afflicted People". His revelations as to the grievous extent of "deathmaking" currently occurring in America right now was so explosive, Dr. Wolfensberger simply could not get his manuscript printed, even though he had published many books.
Professor Wolfensberger warns us that, based upon historic models of societies [like Hitler's Germany] that have later been discovered to have been committing Deathmaking on a large scale, he believes that American medical institutions are already committing Deathmaking. Wolfensberger defines "deathmaking" as referring "to any actions or pattern of actions which either directly or indirectly bring about, or hasten, the death of a person or group. Deathmaking includes actions ranging all the way from explicit, overt, and direct killing of another person, to very concealed and indirect killing that may take a long time to accomplish and may be very difficult to trace; and it can include active participation as well as silent, unobjecting collusion." (p. 1)
I do believe the above news articles above completely fits Professor Wolfensberger's definition of "Deathmaking", above. Remember, America is leading the world into The New World Order, a system precisely identical to Hitler's Dictatorial, Fascist, and Satanic Germany. If we are going into this system, soon, we must be developing the same personal characteristics concerning Hitler's low ethical view of person's lives that Germans exhibited from 1920-1945, as detailed in Lifton's book, "Nazi Doctors".
Professor Wolfensberger lists the changes in personal values that are necessary for a population to come to the place where they will either sanction, or participate in, mass killing. (Pages 25-26) As you read these personal values changes, you will see that America has gone through all of them, starting about 1965!! The time is very late!!
Step 1 -- "A turning away from the world of the spirit and from metaphysical belief systems, a rejection of beliefs in any spirit world, and therefore rejection of beliefs in any divinity, and/or in any divine will or law that is external to human beings."
Step 2 -- "Largely as a result of the above, rejection of the Jewish and Christian faiths, and therefore of their moralities, which include an awe for the mystery of life and a respect for its sacredness." [Note: America has combined Steps 1 & 2, rejecting our Christian foundation, replacing it with self-centered values interested only satisfying our physical needs and lusts.]
In this regard, Liberal preachers and teachers share a huge responsibility for this damning situation, as they have repeatedly either watered down precious Biblical doctrines, or rejected them altogether. Whenever a people rejects Christian morality, rejecting it with a pagan morality, the next Holocaust is only a matter of "when", not "if".
Step 3 -- "An increased preoccupation with the material universe, with material objects, and especially with material technological processes." {American advertising clearly has taken us all the way down this road; we are totally preoccupied with things and technological toys}.
Step 4 -- "A belief of religious proportion in a mythical entity called, 'progress', which is viewed as a human product consisting mostly of scientific and technical developments which support industrialization, which in turn is perceived as subsequently yielding an increase in material wealth, possessions, comfort, convenience, health, welfare, happiness, etc." {Germany held up the mythical entity, Nordic Aryan Racial Purity. American New Agers hold up a spiritual Aryan, "advanced" in all things spiritual}
Step 5 -- "The rejection of a metaphysics results in a very logical idolization of the human, and an exaltation of the individual human to the ultimate measure and measurer of all things." {Think of American advertising in the last decade, with its increasing "idolization" of the perfect human body, of maintaining that perfect human body, and of promoting health as the ultimate ideal of ages 0-100!! Stop and think of all the products advertised in America today that promotes this physical ideal. We are idealizing the human body, much as Hitler's propagandists idealized the Aryan perfected man!}
Step 6 -- "An idolization of human intellect, will power, and its products." {Refer to our program, NEWS1004, Comparison Between Nazi Beliefs and New Age. You will realize immediately how much the New Age religion emphasizes these values.}
Step 7 -- "An unbridled individualism and selfishness..."
Step 8 -- "An attitude of entitlement to whatever one wants..."
Step 9 -- "a belief of quasi-religious proportions that affliction, suffering and hardship are evil, and that they can, must, and will be eliminated, and by human efforts."
Step 10 -- "Combined with the attitude of entitlement, this leads to a belief that one is entitled to freedom from affliction and suffering -- and, indeed, even from hardship and inconvenience." {Not only do we see this attitude in the current argument over euthanasia, we see this attitude greatly in people who drink from the Welfare trough}.
Step 11 -- "These developments also imply a surrender to what one can call hedonism, i.e., indulgence in sensory pleasure, exaggerated and uninhibited aspirations for comfort ... In extreme form, this can lead to unbridled sexual excesses, pornography, gluttony, surrender to drugs, etc."
{Can anyone describe current America any better than this? Remember, we are discussing these things in connection with the traits a nation exhibits as they are leading into a Nazi type Deathmaking! Western Societies fit this bill perfectly!}
Step 12 -- All these values and attitudes described, above, results in a personal trait that Professor Wolfensberger calls "externalism", defined as a person "so deficient in internal personal identity, strength, and mental and emotional substance that they excessively rely -- perhaps must rely -- on constant external supports of a physical, emotional, social and cognitive nature in order to function. These supports can take the form of constantly having radios and television on, even sleeping while these are on, and not being able to carry on a conversation unless there is noise from these or other sources. Another form [of externalism] is fear of being alone, and excessive or even total reliance on peer opinion and guru figures ... Such people are therefore impressionable, easily programmed, faddish, fickle, and prey to movements and cults .."
{Again, Professor Wolfesnberger precisely nails current American society, a society that is heading for Deathmaking!}
Professor Wolfensberger continues, "Externalism and sensualism easily feed back on each other in a vicious circle, as when they lead to drug dependence (be it coffee, nicotine, alcohol, cannabis [marijuana], cocaine, heroin ...) which is an external prop that also meets the lust for sensory excitement and which is a low-level, counterfeit substitute for the rich and noble mental, emotional, intellectual, and spiritual experiences of which humans are capable.
{Again, Wolfensberger is describing America today perfectly; a nation with these values is headed for Deathmaking on a large scale.}
Step 13 -- "Unbridled pursuit of satisfaction and immediate self-gratification also leads to a historic 'here-and-now-ism' that says ... I will pursue what I want now, regardless of its effects in the long run" or regardless of who gets hurt.
The Satanic ideal has always been: "Do what thou wilt, for that is the whole of the law".
Step 14 -- At this point in the development of a society proceeding to Deathmaking, certain individuals step forward to encourage 'voluntary Deathmaking'. Certainly, any person who defends physician-assisted suicide falls into this category. But, also, so do elected or appointed individuals who try to legalize forms of Deathmaking are mightily responsible for that society taking the last step into massive public Deathmaking. Finally, Wolfensberger singles out those authors who have published best selling books on how to commit suicide. This is a huge sign that a society is currently engaged in secretive Deathmaking and is soon to begin public Deathmaking.
DEVALUED PERSONS IN ANY SOCIETY
In this type of society, certain individuals are "devalued" in the corporate national mind. Any "devalued" group is then in real danger of being targeted for elimination. Who were some of these "devalued" groups?
1) Handicapped in any way, mentally, emotionally, physically
2) Criminals, especially deviant ones
3) The very elderly, especially those who are no longer able to pay for the
cost of maintaining their life
4) The very young, especially those from "devalued" groups. Abortion
and Infanticide were regularly practiced in Nazi Germany
5) Derelicts, people of the streets
6) Abandoned deinstitutionalized people
7) Severely and chronically ill people
8) Terminally ill people
9) Anyone who has one more of the above, in combination (Pages 33-34)
10) People who do not fit the National Ideal in terms of race or religion.
Jews in Nazi Germany certainly fit this category. Today, in the New Age, the Jew is replaced by anyone who 'cannot accept the claims of the Christ'. New World Order leaders single out Christians, Jews, and Moslems, none of which can accept the 'Polytheistic' religion of the Christ.
Professor Wolfensberger then described the many ways in which the Deathmaking of devalued people could be disguised by someone in the medical community. The many ways boiled down to a misuse of medical technology or medicine in such a way as to cause death, a death that could be attributed to something else. (Pages 35-49)
Then, he drops the atomic bomb on this issue. He says, that in America today, "In hospitals (even those run by religious bodies), mentally retarded .. people with other handicaps, and elderly people are commonly denied relatively elementary life supports such as antibiotics, basic resuscitation, the simplest medical procedure, or even food and water. In fact, the likelihood is relatively high that persons afflicted with multiple devalued conditions will not leave a hospital alive ... In many locales in North America, it is dangerous to admit to a typical general hospital a moderately retarded person who is above the age of sixty ... Often, the only way to assure the safety of such afflicted persons in hospitals to place at their bed a twenty-four [hour] guard ..." (Pages 60-63)
If you are not reeling from these revelations, consider what Professor Wolfensberger estimates that the following numbers of people are being killed per year in the following ways:
1) Psychoactive Drugs -- administered to mentally disordered, retarded, aged, ill-behaved or demanding people in various settings, killing easily over 100,000 people annually (Page 70).
2) Withholding basic, simple treatments and life supports from people who are elderly, moderately handicapped, terminally ill, [remember the 15% of nurses in our article who admit they kill by just "pretending to administer care?] or imprisoned, are killing another 100,000 people annually.
When one adds the numbers of people killed in abortions and infanticide, Dr. Wolfensberger estimates that our total number of devalued people being killed every four years in America today more than the number of Jews killed by Nazi Germany in 1941-1945!! (Pages 70-71)
Before you automatically reject these assertions, please reflectively consider the following facts:
The New World Order America is leading the world into is exactly Hitler's system
Religiously, Nazism and the New Age Movement share over 40 common beliefs, including teachings on Aryanism and "root races" (See NEWS1004). Additionally, New Age teaches the same "Secret Doctrine" that Hitler was taught, a spiritual doctrine that teaches the elimination of "inferior" races.
Professor Wolfensberger describes any society that is heading for a values change that will result in Deathmaking. In so doing, he describes contemporary America perfectly.
OCCULT BASIS FOR THIS MASSIVE DEATHMAKING
New Age doctrine holds that our Earth is overpopulated by two-thirds. (Friends of the Earth, Chairman, David Brower, "Progress As If Survival Mattered," 1981, p. 68-70). While they never offer the Plan to get from 6 billion to 2 billion people, their writings teach that the Christ will "cleanse" the earth, starting before the year 2,000. {Ruth Montgomery, "Herald of the New Age", p. 232-271}
How do you think they will achieve this reduction in so short a time?
Biblical prophecy foretells that the time of the Antichrist will result in wars and persecutions of unprecedented dimensions. If you add up all the people killed in the Book of Revelation, it amounts to two-thirds!
Yet, for all this the Bible prophecies that people will be living very normally until these disasters break in full force upon them {1 Thessalonians 5:1-3; Daniel 12:10b, "none of the wicked shall understand ..."; Luke 17:28-30)
Do not be deceived. The End of the Age is close, very close. We see the emergence of a system of global government which precisely mirrors Biblical prophecy, and it is called The New World Order, a rebirth of Nazism in all its horrors. Our values and attitudes are subtly, gradually and invisibly being changed, to where enough people in our society can and will support the Deathmaking goals of the New World Order. And, as this news articles at the beginning of this program indicates, significant Deathmaking is already occurring. The Kingdom of Antichrist is coming very soon.
Are you spiritually ready? Is your family? Are you adequately protecting your loved ones? This is the reason for this ministry, to enable you to first understand the peril facing you, and then help you develop strategies to warn and protect your loved ones. Once you have been thoroughly trained, you can also use your knowledge as a means to open the door of discussion with an unsaved person. I have been able to use it many times, and have seen people come to Jesus Christ as a result. These perilous times are also a time when we can reach many souls for Jesus Christ, making an eternal difference.
If you have accepted Jesus Christ as your personal Savior, but have been very lukewarm in your spiritual walk with Him, you need to immediately ask Him for forgiveness and for renewal. He will instantly forgive you, and fill your heart with the joy of the Holy Spirit. Then, you need to begin a daily walk of prayer and personal Bible Study.
If you have never accepted Jesus Christ as Savior, but have come to realize His reality and the approaching End of the Age, and want to accept His FREE Gift of Eternal Life, you can also do so now, in the privacy of your home. Once you accept Him as Savior, you are spiritually Born Again, and are as assured of Heaven as if you were already there. Then, you can rest assured that the Kingdom of Antichrist will not touch you spiritually.
If you would like to become Born Again, turn to our Salvation Page now.
We hope you have been blessed by this ministry, which seeks to educate and warn people, so that they can see the coming New World Order -- Kingdom of Antichrist -- in their daily news.
Finally, we would love to hear from you.
You can contact us by mail or email.
God bless you.
Copyright © 2004 Cutting Edge Ministries. All rights reserved. This password protected article and its contents are protected under the copyright laws of the United States and other countries. This article is provided by subscription only for use by the subscriber and all other rights are expressly reserved by the copyright owner. Copying and pasting this article, in whole or in part, into e-mails or as attachments to e-mails or posting it on the Internet is strictly prohibited and may subject the offender to civil liability and severe criminal penalties (Title 17, United States Code, section 501 and 506).
Copying and distributing
this article in violation of the above notice is also a violation of God's moral
law.
Become a Headline news subscriber HERE.