YOU ARE NOW ON THE CUTTING EDGE

We reissued NEWS1631 last week, an article originally posted in late March, 2002. This article put forth a rather radical premise, one reached after considerable study of the Illuminati plan to ignite the World War III which will produce the Masonic Christ. This premise is that, since the countries driving the New World Order Plan -- United States, Great Britain, Israel -- possess the largest qualitative military edge over the countries of Islam in history, the old tried-and-true "Blood In The Streets" strategy seemed "appropriate" to employ.

This strategy calls for the military force possessing a huge technological advantage to provoke the other side into a military conflict. Once the all-out conflict is under way, the military force possessing the huge advantage can easily destroy the other side without suffering significant casualties.

If our premise is correct, we postulated in March, 2002, that we should see attempts on the part of the United States and Great Britain to so alienate and enrage Muslims throughout the world that our actions could provoke Islamic country after country into attacking us. Thus, Cutting Edge felt that Coalition Forces would be taking steps to stimulate the kind of anger, rage, and hatred which would drive these countries to war.

In NEWS1913, we reported on the sadistic sexual abuse and torture by American and British soldiers which is truly alienating the Muslim people. However, other matters alienate the Muslims as much or more than this sexual degradation. In this article, we shall examine a sensitivity all Muslims share that is even greater than the torture and sexual abuse of which our forces now stand accused.

That area of sensitivity is the mosque. Since Islam is an aggressive, global religious force seeking to compel all peoples of the world to convert or die, Muslims are always very sensitive to matters of their religion versus any Infidel religion. Thus, they are very sensitive to any perceived slight from an Army of an "Infidel Religion". Therefore, when we invaded and occupied Iraq, our soldiers should have been very sensitive to the issue of the importance Muslims place upon their mosques. Sadly, we seemingly have run roughshod over this sensibility in our year-long occupation and our pursuit of the guerilla war.

This American woman married to a Muslim said that, just days ago, she was with some of their friends when the time came to watch Arab TV news. While the Muslims were upset by the sexual abuse and torture perpetrated by American forces, they became positively enraged when they viewed scenes of a mosque destroyed in the town of Fallujah. As long as she had been married to a Muslim, this lady just did not realize the extreme sensitivity they exhibited over an infidel violation of a mosque.

Let us now examine news stories which tell of our desecration and/or destruction of mosques.

COALITION FORCES' VIOLATION AND DESTRUCTION OF ISLAMIC MOSQUES IN IRAQ

NEWS BRIEF: "U.S. Troops Raid Abu Hanifa Mosque, Destroy Fallujah Relief Goods", by Dahr Jamail, The News Standard, April 19, 2004

"Baghdad , Apr 19 - According to witnesses, US troops recently raided and damaged an important Baghdad mosque and destroyed food aid gathered there for residents of Fallujah, a city currently besieged by other US forces. Mr. Alber, a spokesman at the Abu Hanifa mosque in Adhamiya, explained that the US military raided the mosque during a search for weapons recently. Alber said the soldiers destroyed two gates of the mosque with tanks and drove a Humvee over three tons of food aid the mosque was stockpiling for Fallujah residents."

Mosques occupy the central position in the heart and mind of the Muslim people. Therefore, we should expect that mosques would be used for such things as stockpiling food and supplies for Fallujah citizens. Let us return to this article for more information.

"On April 11 at 3:30am, US troops raided the mosque by using tanks to crash through the gate near the food storage area for the besieged people of Fallujah', Alber said. 'The other gate a tank smashed through was over near the student dormitory and the martyr’s cemetery' .... 40 soldiers entered the mosque while about 60 guarded the outside. Those inside went first into the main area of the mosque where people were praying and many Red Crescent volunteers from Kirkuk were resting before delivering more aid to Fallujah. According to Alber, the soldiers entered with their boots on, made everyone stay on their knees with their faces down on the ground, and held guns to them." [Ibid.]

"Witnesses insisted the search turned up no weapons of any kind among the tons of foodstuffs awaiting distribution. Most of the doors of the college inside the mosque compound were smashed in near the locks, while bullet pockmarks were evident in the walls and ceiling. Mr. Alber stated, 'After two hours of being held with our faces on the ground and Americans putting their feet on people, the soldiers did not find one bullet. Then they simply left. A year ago they would apologize for these things. Now they have canceled their apologies. Now they apologize by stomping on our necks!' Among Iraqis, the act of being stepped on is considered an extraordinary humiliation." [Ibid.]

Once again, we see our soldiers taking specific action that is aimed directly at specific sensibilities of Muslims. Just as our torture and sexual degradation practices were aimed specifically at Islamic sensitivities, so are these actions. As this author stated, "Among Iraqis, the act of being stepped on is considered an extraordinary humiliation". However, the act of being stepped on while praying in a Mosque is a monumental insult! These men were forced to remain on their knees for hours in the Mosque compound with rifles pointed at them and with some of the supplicants being stepped on. No wonder these American Muslim friends of this lady were so upset.

Remember, this kind of activity enrages the Muslim even more than the torture and sexual degradation of which our troops stand accused.

"Alber said this is the third time Abu Hanifa has been raided by US soldiers ... Kassem, a 54 year-old grandfather who works as one of the guards at the mosque, said a US soldier hit him in the forehead with the butt of an M-16 rifle when they were looking for weapons. He stated, 'When I fell to the ground they kicked me! They came to humiliate the people of Islam. Why else? We have no guns here, no mujahedeen. They want to destroy the Islamic religion'." [Ibid.]

Herein lies the crux of the disaster unfolding before us in Iraq. For all our high-flying rhetoric about "winning the hearts and minds" of the Iraqi people, our troops on the ground are alienating them by the many thousands. Our government will have us believe that the vast majority of the Iraqi people have welcomed us as liberators while those who are truly against us amount to a very small percentage of the population. However, our occupation has been brutal enough to have caused Shiite and Sunni factions to unite for the first time in nearly 600 years! That fact alone should give anyone pause who believes the government line.

Let us conclude this story with one more segment.

"After the Imam finished speaking, the crowd within the mosque dispersed. Outside a member of the mosque who asked to remain anonymous said, 'Nobody can accept this. The only thing they haven’t done yet is rape our women in the street'. Another man who asked to be called Abu Fatman stated, 'I have just come from Fallujah yesterday. The Americans are killing families there. US aircraft are bombing women and children in their houses when they attack'. The US military in Baghdad regularly conducts weapons searches throughout neighborhoods of the city. Recently, the military has been criticized heavily by Sunni Iraqis for their heavy-handed searches of holy sites." [Ibid.]

Let us now examine another Arab article on the same American raid on the Abu Hanifa Mosque, picking up significant revelations not included in the first article.

NEWS BRIEF: "This is what occupation looks like: Destruction of relief supplies and rampage at the Aadimiyah mosque", by Rahul Mahajan, Empire Notes, April 14, 2004, http://zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=15&ItemID=5324

"The U.S. military has many suspicions that mujaheddin are leaving Fallujah and that guns and fighters are being smuggled in through the relief program for Fallujah. So they paid a visit to the mosque in Aadhamiyah on Sunday. Built around the tomb of Abu Hanifa, the founder of the moderate Hanafi school of Islamist jurisprudence and one of the most important figures in the history of Sunni Islam, the mosque is 1250 years old. Although Umm al-Marek is bigger, Abu Hanifa is probably the most important Sunni mosque in Baghdad, and a site of pilgrimage for Muslims around the world ... They started the raid the way they virtually always do -- by smashing in the gates with tanks and then driving Hummers in ... The mosque was full of people, including 90 down from Kirkuk (many with the Red Crescent). They were all pushed down on the floor, with guns put to the backs of their heads ... We went all around the mosque and the adjacent madrassah, the Imam Aadham Islamic College. We saw dozens of doors broken down, windows broken, ceilings ripped apart, and bullet holes in walls and ceilings. The way the soldiers searched for illicit arms in the ceiling was first to spray the ceiling with gunfire, then break out a panel and go up and search ... And, of course, they entered the mosque with their boots on ... You can guess how many hearts and minds were won by this little operation -- the third time that the mosque has been raided since the war."

One Coalition attack on another Fallujah mosque caused heavy civilian casualties.

NEWS BRIEF: "US Bombs Fallujah Mosque: More Than 40 Worshippers Killed", Common Dreams, by Bassem Mroue and Abdul-Qader Saadi, Published on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 by the Associated Press

"FALLUJAH - U.S. Marines in a fierce battle for this Sunni Muslim stronghold fired rockets that hit a mosque compound filled with worshippers today, and witnesses said as many as 40 people were killed. Shiite-inspired violence spread to nearly all of the country ... An Associated Press reporter in Fallujah saw cars ferrying the dead and wounded from the Abdul-Aziz al-Samarrai mosque. Witnesses said a helicopter fired three missiles into the compound, destroying part of a wall surrounding the mosque but not damaging the main building. The strike came as worshippers had gathered for afternoon prayers, witnesses said. Temporary hospitals were set up in private homes to treat the wounded and prepare the dead for burial ... Scores of Iraqis also have been wounded, as mosques called for a holy war against Americans and women carried guns in the streets ... Sixteen children and eight women were reported killed when warplanes struck four houses late Tuesday, said Hatem Samir, a Fallujah Hospital official."

Therefore, from these articles we can see that our "heavy-handed searches of holy sites" is creating great anger on the streets of Iraq. This American married to a Muslim here in the United States can also testify that such tactics against holy sites is creating great anger on the streets of America! Their anger over damage and destruction of Mosques and other holy places is greater than their anger over the sexual abuses and tortures we have been committing. This type of destruction of Muslim holy places is guaranteed to thoroughly anger most Muslims.

We could not be making more enemies if we tried!

Now, let us examine an article from the side of the Coalition on the subject of attacking mosques. Notice our justification for attacking mosques.

NEWS BRIEF: "Mosques will be targeted: US", news.com.au., April 23, 2004

"A SENIOR US army officer said today that Iraqi mosques will be targeted by his troops if they are used as fire bases or weapons storage depots. Brigadier General Mark Kimmitt, speaking to CNN from Baghdad, said US forces had dropped two 227kg precision-guided bombs on a mosque compound in Fallujah, Iraq, because local insurgents were using the compound as cover to fire at US soldiers."

We all want our military commanders to take the actions necessary to protect the lives of our brave soldiers. However, there is a big difference in entering a mosque quietly and entering a mosque with tanks knocking down the doors. There is a big difference between carefully searching a mosque and forcing hundreds upon hundreds of noncombatants to remain on their knees in a prayer position with guns pointed at them, actions that are guaranteed to alienate them and turn them into resistance fighters. This war is certainly beginning to feel a great deal like Vietnam!

NEWS BRIEF: "US troops shell Fallujah mosque", From correspondents in Iraq, April 16, 2004

"THE second largest mosque in the besieged city of Fallujah was shelled by US forces today, an AFP correspondent witnessed. The top of the minaret of the Hadret Mohammediya mosque and religious school was destroyed in the shelling at about 6.30pm (12.30am AEST). Parts of the outer wall were also hit and most of the windows of the complex were destroyed ... "

This article simply did not state whether our shelling was prompted by Iraqi insurgents firing from the mosque, or from a belief on the part of American commanders that the mosque was used to store contraband weapons. As far as I could tell, our attack and destruction of a portion of this mosque was not prompted by any specific threat.

At least one American news organization realizes the terrible tactical mistake our forces are making in attacking mosques, under any circumstances. Listen:

NEWS BRIEF: "Iraq: Mosque Attack a Strategic Error?", STRATFOR | April 07, 2004 2228 GMT

"U.S. forces have fired upon a mosque in central Iraq and have seized another in an effort to flush out Shiite insurgents. These separate but related incidents will lend a seeming justification not only to jihadists in Iraq, but also to al Qaeda ... During a six-hour battle April 7, a U.S. military helicopter and F-16 fighter jet attacked the Abdel-Aziz al-Samarrai mosque in Al Fallujah with missiles and a laser-guided bomb ... In another part of the city, Sunni insurgents fired rocket-propelled grenades on the minarets of the al-Muadidi mosque following its seizure by U.S. forces ... The United States has crossed a line with the bombing and seizure of the two mosques, and the move undoubtedly will hinder coalition counterinsurgency operations. Not only will it cement the resolve of the jihadists, it will resonate with the secular Sunni guerrillas as well ... The mosque attack will reinforce the perception in the Arab and Muslim world that the U.S. war against terrorism is really a war against Islam ... This could hardly come at a worse time for the coalition -- or a better time for the new Shiite insurgency. It will provide Muqtada al-Sadr a means to amplify support for his movement, and it will make it very difficult for Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani and the Iraqi Governing Council to rein him in. The U.S. tactical decision to target militants in a specific situation likely was a strategic error, and this miscalculation will not slink quietly into the night. Quite the opposite ..."

We could go on and on with articles showing that we have begun to attack and destroy mosques in Iraq. According to this STRATFOR article, we began attacking mosques only recently. Coalition commanders are insisting that they are "forced" to attack mosques because enemy forces are firing from them. This may or may not be true, for we know that "truth is the first casualty of war", and we know our Pentagon regularly lies. However, Coalition commanders have to weigh any tactical consideration gained by such attacks against the country-wide effect of so angering Muslims that their resistance to our efforts will staggeringly increase.

Pentagon tacticians likewise have to decide whether the tactical gain is worth setting off great anger amongst Muslims the world over. As this American married to a Muslim reported, her Muslim in-laws and friends were simply enraged when they saw the destruction of mosques on TV last weekend (May 1, 2004). Once again, we are left with the premise that we seem to be insulting Muslims very heavily right now in ways that seem precisely aimed at Muslim sensibilities. On April 30, The New Yorker Magazine broke the story that American prison guards have been regularly torturing and sexually abusing Muslim prisoners. On May 1, these Muslims now living in Boston saw destruction of mosques on Arab TV.

This time period (April 30 - May 1) was the Satanic high holy day of Beltaine. Is this timing coincidence?

KILLING SIGNIFICANT NUMBERS OF CIVILIANS

Another development causing great anger amongst Muslims worldwide is the significant numbers of Iraqi civilians Coalition Forces are killing. According to this American married to a Muslim, the issue of killing of civilians ranked second in the actions we are taking that are seriously angering Muslims worldwide. These two issues are angering Muslims far greater than the issue of torture and rape now breaking upon our Daily News.

Let us first hear from our British allies as they complain how wantonly we are targeting civilians.

NEWS BRIEF: "US tactics condemned by British officers", By Sean Rayment, Defence Correspondent, news.telegraph.co.uk, April 11, 2004, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/04/11/wtact11.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/04/11/

"Senior British commanders have condemned American military tactics in Iraq as heavy-handed and disproportionate ... The officer, who agreed to the interview on the condition of anonymity, said that part of the problem was that American troops viewed Iraqis as untermenschen - the Nazi expression for 'sub-humans'. Speaking from his base in southern Iraq, the officer said: 'My view and the view of the British chain of command is that the Americans' use of violence is not proportionate and is over-responsive to the threat they are facing. They don't see the Iraqi people the way we see them. They view them as untermenschen. They are not concerned about the Iraqi loss of life in the way the British are. Their attitude towards the Iraqis is tragic, it's awful."

Lest you think this British officer is wrongheaded about this matter, that he does not know whereof he speaks, let us hear directly from an American soldier, in an email he sent his father. In our Newsletter041704, we quoted his email in full; here, we shall just quote his specific remarks which demonstrate his Nazi attitude that then enemy is sub-human, no better than rats.

"Dad our platoon alone has killed over 200 of those (again) m*********ers" .... I believe they do not consider the foe as human...and they're not ... he knows that the cellar is still full of rats and every day you enter the cellar they will try and bite you...especially those that came to Iraq to die. I know that he is fine because he signed-off with, 'Semper Fi Dad, I love you'."

Once significant portions of an army possess this type of subhuman attitude towards their enemy, genocidal killing is virtually inevitable. I find it shocking to learn that this is the attitude of this soldier, and undoubtedly, many others. Now, let us return to further revelations from this British officer.

"The officer explained that, under British military rules of war, British troops would never be given clearance to carry out attacks similar to those being conducted by the US military, in which helicopter gunships have been used to fire on targets in urban areas ... 'When US troops are attacked with mortars in Baghdad, they use mortar-locating radar to find the firing point and then attack the general area with artillery, even though the area they are attacking may be in the middle of a densely populated residential area. They may well kill the terrorists in the barrage but they will also kill and maim innocent civilians. That has been their response on a number of occasions.' " [Telegraph, op. cit.]

Now that we have learned from our British allies that American troops are now regularly targeting civilians, and now that we are learned from this American Marine that some of our soldiers believe that Iraqis are "rats in a cellar", let us examine some Arab reporting of this terribly tragic subject.

NEWS BRIEF: "Opening the Gates of Hell", Report from Baghdad, by Rahul Mahajan, ZNET, April 07, 2004, http://zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=15&ItemID=5283

"Before the Iraq war, at a meeting of the Arab League, Secretary General Amr Moussa famously said that a U.S. war on Iraq would 'open the gates of hell'. In Iraq, those gates are yawning wider than they ever have before -- at least for the United States. 'Sunni and Shi'a are now one hand, together against the Americans', a man on the street in the mostly Shi'a slum of Shuala on the west side of Baghdad told me ... Whether or not the resistance here grows to a scale that the United States cannot control ... it is already clear that the events of the last ten days mark a critical turning point in the occupation of Iraq ... during the war, Falluja was not a hotbed of resistance. Its turn to resistance started on April 28, when U.S. troops opened fire on a group of 100 to 200 peaceful protesters, killing 15. They claimed they were returning gunfire, but Human Rights Watch investigated and found that the bullet holes in the area were inconsistent with that story -- and, furthermore, every Iraqi witness maintained that the crowd was unarmed. Two days later, another three protesters were killed. These incidents caused many people in the area to join the resistance, forming their own groups ... Violence back and forth and frequent collective punishment measures levied on the town quickly turned it into a place seething with anger against the occupation -- to an even greater degree than other places."

Several weeks ago, we noted in the Daily News that our heavy-handed methods had driven Sunni and Shiite groups to unite for the first time in nearly 600 years. This "man on the street:" noted this historically significant event. When our tactics have driven historical enemies into an alliance, you know that a lot has gone wrong with our "war of liberation" in Iraq. Indeed, it is to this subject that this author then turns his attention.

"... there is no quicker way to get an Iraqi to laugh than to talk about how the United States is bringing freedom or democracy to the country. It's standard when talking about the latest problem the Americans cause, to say derisively, "This is the freedom." When I asked Rasool Gurawi, a spokesman at the al-Sadr office in Thawra, the slum of two million that is perhaps al-Sadr's strongest base of support, about Bush's claims, he said, 'This is democracy? Attacking peaceful demonstrations? Killing people and destroying buildings?" [Ibid.]

Iraqis seem aghast at the terrible military might being thrown at them right now; however, most of the consternation seems to be occurring because our unstoppable military might is being directed against common civilians as well as against "insurgents". Toward this end, Rahul Mahajan concludes his article:

"The people in the Shi'a slums of Baghdad who are now furiously resisting the Americans hate Saddam with a passion to this day. They suffered under his repression and they also suffered from neglect, especially under the sanctions -- scarce resources and repairs went to politically more favored areas. They expected great improvements when the United States took over. Shaykh Sadun al-Shemary, a former member of the Iraqi army who participated in the 1991 uprising and now a spokesman for the al-Sadr organization in Shuala, told me, "Things are exactly the same as in Saddam's time -- maybe worse."

"That is all you need to know about the occupation of Iraq." [Ibid.]

Now, let us hear from one disgruntled Iraqi resistance fighter. Notice the date of this story, and the date on which Americans started killing Iraqi civilians. Notice, also, that this news outlet is the San Francisco Gate, a major American newspaper.

NEWS BRIEF: "Bitter Iraqi vents anger by killing U.S. troops", SFGate.com, October 7, 2003

"Every day, he tries to kill American soldiers. Sometimes, from a hideout in the rattling reeds and bulrushes of the fertile Euphrates valley, 28-year-old Mohammed and a small group of fellow guerrilla fighters launch rocket-propelled grenades at passing American vehicles. Other days, they hide in the shadowy grid of dusty date-palm forests, firing mortars at improvised U.S. checkpoints ... But for the Americans, the danger is ever present and growing, as more and more Mohammeds decide that they are willing to give up their lives if necessary to protest the takeover of their country. The restive valleys of the Tigris and Euphrates have for months been the staging grounds of relentless guerrilla warfare against the U.S. occupation. Every day, rebels stage an average of 15 attacks on coalition troops -- lobbing mortars at the soldiers, firing from semiautomatic rifles, machine guns and RPG launchers, and blowing them up with remote-controlled explosive devises, said Lt. Col. George Krivo, a U.S. military spokesman. Contrary to assertions by American officials, including President Bush, Mohammed said neither he nor the rebels he operates with were either foreign militants or supporters of deposed dictator Saddam Hussein. He said he wanted to kill American soldiers simply because "they occupied our country."

"They are Satan," he said. "They became our enemy."

"... For Mohammed, the turning point came when American soldiers killed 15 Iraqi demonstrators in Fallujah in April, two weeks after Hussein's regime fell. We didn't start fighting against Americans until they started fighting against our people," Mohammed said. 'First we were so happy because we thought they would get rid of Saddam and leave immediately. Then they showed their real face. They started killing our relatives and friends and our brothers, and of course we had to start to give it back. We started after the demonstration'. Every man and woman interviewed for this story said they knew of or were related to someone who had been killed or wounded by U.S. soldiers during raids in the area." [Ibid.]

Did you catch the extent of our killing of civilians? "Every man and woman interviewed for this story said they knew of or were related to someone who had been killed or wounded by U.S. soldiers during raids in the area."

How can we be killing Iraqi civilians in large numbers? The British accusation that too many of our soldiers look upon Iraqi civilians as "untermenschen - the Nazi expression for 'sub-humans'. However, this next statement reveals another reason we are killing too many civilians.

"Mohammed does not know how many Americans he has killed, because checking for casualties right after an attack is too risky. 'When we attack, they start shooting like blind people, in all directions', he said. That often means more Iraqi civilian deaths, but Mohammed said he was willing to sacrifice a few of his compatriots for the cause. 'This is also psychological, because then the Americans make enemies," Mohammed said. 'People will not like them again'." [Ibid.]

Iraq or Vietnam?

Now, let us examine an interesting article contrasting our current occupation and guerilla war in Iraq to the occupation and guerilla war in Vietnam.

NEWS BRIEF: "Will Bush now destroy Baghdad to "save" it?", 04/09/2004, http://www.stargeek.com/item/89557.html

"Christine Hauser reports in the NYT today: Americans found themselves fighting intensely against two main segments of the population, using warplanes, attack helicopters and armored units against the groups the United States had said it came to liberate when it invaded war in March last year ... Pulitzer prize winning journalist Anthony Shadid filed this report from Baghdad in the Washington Post today: "The Mahdi Army is the people," said Abu Raja Kinani, a tribal elder in the neighborhood, his voice exasperated ... Destroying the Mahdi Army, they said, might be possible only by destroying Sadr City."

Now, this author begins to check off the parallels between Iraq today and Vietnam of yesteryear.

* "Resistance enjoys support of large portion of civilian population. Check."

* "Resistance is civilian by day, guerrilla by night? Check."

* "Resistance is fighting against a foreign occupier that claims support for democracy but is actually allied with corrupt elite? Check."

"Sounds like a small country in South East Asia a generation ago, in another war where the political leadership of America involved America in a war overseas under false pretenses, and made the American military and the civilians of the occupied country pay the price for its lies. We know how that ended -- not well for anyone, neither Americans or Vietnamese. And it sounds like we are on the same course again. Bush's incompetent arrogance is setting us up for another defeat."

CONCLUSION

We posted NEWS1631 in late March, 2002 -- 2 years, 2 months ago. This article was entitled, "Blood In The Streets": Perfect Blueprint For Eliminating Iraq First And Then All Of Islam". We postulated that, based upon our research into the Illuminati plan to produce Antichrist, we felt that one of the major goals in invading Iraq was to badly alienate all Islamic peoples. Why would we want to do this? Because we possess such a huge technological weapons edge over the armies of Islam that goading them into attacking our forces would be the most cost-effective way in which to annihilate them. All followers of Monotheistic religions are targeted for annihilation, with the people of Islam first on the list.

Because of the huge technological military edge over the armies of Islam by Western forces, all you have to do is to make most of the entire Muslim population blind with rage and hatred. Then, when they come at your forces in wave after wave, Western military can simply "mow them down".

When the news broke that Coalition Forces had been systematically torturing and sexually abusing Muslim Iraqi "detainees" for one full year, I noticed that the specific types of torture and sexual abuse seemed precisely aimed at specific types of sensibilities that Muslims possess! In other words, we were treating these Muslim prisoners in exactly the way which will make them and the population the most angry! Once I confirmed this analysis with several sources, I then began to realize that people very high up the Chain of Command ladder had to have devised these specific types of torture for these enlisted people -- E-2 to E-5 -- to carry out. Our leaders in Military Intelligence and the C.I.A. knew that, if these pictures ever got out in the open, entire populations of Muslim all over the world would immediately go into "orbit" with rage and hatred.

But, if our premise in NEWS1631 is correct, we want the population of Muslims all over the world angry as a hive of African Honey Bees against us.

We posted NEWS1913 last night. This article detailed each specific abuse and showed how each one seems targeted specifically against a particular Muslim religious sensibility. We also showed why it is likely that President Bush knew of these abuses as early as January 15, 2004, making his promise on April 30 that we had eliminated "torture chambers" and all "rape rooms" from Iraq a lie. We demonstrated news stories indicating that the Pentagon, Military Intelligence, and the C.I.A. created and directed these abuses.

Now, this article demonstrates that Muslims are angered over the desecration of mosques by infidel armies and the wanton killing of civilians even more than they are angered over torture and sexual degradation.

The entire Muslim Middle East may be thought of as a boiling cauldron right now. The "witches brew" percolating in that cauldron is comprised of several strong elements that seem to be cooking toward a boil. These elements causing Muslims to hate Americans, British, and Jews right now are:

1. Invasion of Iraq and the capture of an Islamic capital by Infidel forces

2. The knowledge amongst educated Iraqis that we unleashed Depleted Uranium nuclear war against them in 1991 and in 2003-4

3. The systematic torture and sexual degradation of prisoners in a manner which humiliates Muslims because of their religious beliefs

4. The desecration and destruction of mosques

5. The increasing killing of Iraqi civilians

Over time, this "witches brew" will continue to "cook", coming closer to a boil. However, we believe a single horrifying incident will be needed at just the right time to cause this cauldron to reach "critical mass" and explode with unbelievable fury throughout the Muslim world. We believe the destruction of the Dome of the Rock -- by any means -- may very well be that incident.

Or, we might have to start worrying about Basra, for in 1933, H.G. Wells wrote a book entitled, "The Shape of Things To Come". In this book, he revealed a part of the Illuminati plan to start the World War III that would usher in the "Modern World-State" that will be ruled by "The Christ" -- Antichrist. Listen carefully to this part of the Plan, for we may see it come to pass in our Daily News:

".. the plan for the 'Modern World-State' would succeed in its third attempt (Third World War) and would come out of something that would occur in Basra, Iraq." ["The Globalists: The Power Elite Exposed", by Dr. Dennis Cuddy, p. 50.

Once Islamic armies come against Western interests in the Middle East, Western powers will have the excuse they need to unleash our unbelievable array of weaponry, annihilating entire armies and possibly entire peoples. This type of event would be a perfect unfolding of the "Blood In The Streets" Strategy!

Truly, events seem to be spiraling toward the pre-determined end: the World War III that will produce Antichrist.