Title: U.S.
SUPREME COURT SILENTLY STRIPS INDIVIDUAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS!
SECOND AMENDMENT NO LONGER APPLIES TO INDIVIDUAL
CITIZENS! -- Part 1 of 2 Title: U.S.
SUPREME COURT SILENTLY STRIPS INDIVIDUAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS!
SECOND AMENDMENT NO LONGER APPLIES TO INDIVIDUAL
CITIZENS! -- Part 1 of 2
|
Resources to aid your Understanding
|
|
|
Learn how to protect yourself, your loved ones!
Stand by for insights so startling you will never look at the news the same way again.
YOU ARE NOW ON
THE CUTTING EDGE
The bottom of this playing card reads: "By using its action, the Supreme Court can cancel one action of any other government group. Yes, this includes Government groups outside the U.S. Don't ask. You don't want to know." [Playing Card from the "Illuminati Card Game": NEWS1753; NEWS1855; NEWS1856; NEWS1857]
SUPREME COURT GUTS OUR CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHT TO OWN AND BEAR ARMS!
Most of you probably missed the most devastating single attack against our Constitutional Government in a very long time, a blow struck by the U.S. Supreme Court on December 1, 2003. On that date, the Supreme Court refused to consider an appeal filed against an earlier decision by the 9th Circuit Court, a decision which held that individual citizens were not granted the right to own and bear firearms, as the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution so plainly reads!
Let us stop for a moment to read the Second Amendment to the Constitution:
U.S. Constitution -- "Amendment II --A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." [Cornell University Law School, http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html#amendmentii ]
Very simply, and very effectively, our Founding Fathers protected the ability of each individual citizen, and the state of which he is a part, to "keep and bear arms" for defense. In reading this amendment, you must focus on the first tiny comma, for that punctuation mark divides this guarantee into two separate, but equal, parts. First, each "free state" of the Union was granted the ability to create and maintain a "well regulated militia"; note that his guarantee says, "well regulated", not Federal Government regulated!
After the comma, a second guarantee was granted, i.e., the "right of the people" to " keep and bear arms". The term, "people" simply means the individual citizen of the United States of America. Therefore, each individual citizen has a Constitutionally-guaranteed right to keep and bear arms!
Then, the second comma contains the teeth of the guarantee: "shall not be infringed". In other words, both the right of the state to maintain a militia AND the right of the individual citizen to keep and bear arms "shall not be infringed". This definition is the simple, straightforward meaning of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Why did our Founding Fathers place such a strict guarantee to the right of individual citizens to own guns? To a man, they were well aware that the greatest threat in history to a citizen's "pursuit of peace and happiness" is his own government! They were sick and tired of the kings of Europe wreaking tyranny, bloodshed, torture, and injustice upon their own citizens. They were sick and tired of the role the Roman Catholic Pope had exerted in Europe and Great Britain in forcing individual monarchs to murder their own people under the threat of personal excommunication. By the time of the American Revolution, the Catholic Office of the Inquisition had been raining down death, torture, and destruction for nearly 1,300 years (NOTE: The Inquisition began in 600 A.D., aimed primarily at practitioners of Black Magick Witchcraft; Peter Tomkins, "The Magic of Obelisks", p. 55).
Without doubt, the kings of Europe and Great Britain subscribed to the mentality espoused later in Nazi Germany. Listen:
"On all sides, there took shape the principle that the practice of extermination was part of the legitimate business of government." ["The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide", by Robert Jay Lifton, p. 48]
To ensure that a tyrannical government could never, ever impose a dictatorship, our Founding Fathers decided to constitutionally guarantee that every single adult in America could own guns. Our Founding Fathers undoubtedly were aware of the following definition of "Democracy" and "Constitutional Republic":
"Democracy:
Political system in which 4 wolves and 3 sheep are allowed to vote on what to do about dinner.
Constitutional Republic:
Political system in which the 4 wolves and 3 sheep are bound by a constitution which prohibits discussions of dinner, and the sheep are armed.
'Gentlemen, we have given you a Constitutional Republic, if you can keep it'. Benjamin Franklin, 1776"SIDE NOTE: In recent years, we have heard much Administration rhetoric on the desirability of establishing "democracy" throughout the world, especially in Muslim countries. While this rhetoric sounds like President Bush wants to establish the same type of government throughout the world as we possess in America, the reality is totally different. We have never had a democracy, as our Founding Fathers considered such a system completely unworkable in the long run, simply because skilled propagandists and demagogues can easily manipulate the masses. Therefore, our government was set up as a Constitutional Republic, where the people elected representatives who were charged with the responsibility to carry out the duties of their office in a manner consistent with the Constitution of the United States!
The next time you hear President Bush extol "democracy", remember this historic fact: "Democracies are unworkable and lead to tyranny"!
Even in this era of unprecedented conventional military capability, the task facing any government who wants to forcibly remove all our guns from the American people is daunting; to take our guns away, a military force would seemingly have to go house-to-house, thus negating most of the superiority of weapons systems our Military possesses. How many guns do Americans own?
"American culture is a gun culture ... 75 to 86 million people own a total of about 200 to 240 million guns ..." ["More Guns, Less Crime", John R. Lott, Jr., p. 1]
Yet, our government does intend to take our weapons away, at the right time and during the right crisis. But, first, the government must take away the Constitutional guarantee to individually owned guns. You see, Hitler discovered a very valuable lesson as he was beginning to slaughter opponents and those people "living lives unworthy of life". He discovered that many Germans were opposing the slaughter -- not on the basis of morality -- but simply because such slaughter was "against the law"! Therefore, Hitler simply changed the law, thus silencing such German critics. Listen to the crass "morality" of one mental hospital officer, protesting the government's wanton illegal slaughter:
"If the government actually wishes to carry out the extermination of these patients ... should not a clearly formulated law be proclaimed ... as in the case of the Sterilization Law"? (Op. Cit., Lifton, p. 81]!
Armed with the realization that such a draconian measure such as taking away our right to own and bear arms might stir up citizens like this German mental hospital officer, has the Illuminati decided to remove our legal, Constitutional right, first -- well before troops begin to confiscate guns? When an individual gun-owner tries to protest that he has a Constitutionally-guaranteed right to own and bear arms, he will be told -- probably brutally -- that this is no longer the case!
ORIGINAL 9TH CIRCUIT COURT DECISION
NEWS BRIEF: "Court Upholds State Assault Weapons Ban", L.A. Times, December 6, 2002 - http://jl-site.com/2ndAmendment/Court12-6-02.html
"U.S. appellate panel rules that the 2nd Amendment does not give individuals the right to keep and bear arms. The 3-0 decision, declaring that the 2nd Amendment protects only the right of states to organize and maintain militias ... California adopted the nation's most sweeping assault weapons ban in 1999 ... In February 2000, a month after the law took effect, a group of individuals who either own assault weapons or want to buy them challenged the law in U.S. District Court in Sacramento, contending that it violated the 2nd Amendment, the equal protection clause and other constitutional provisions ... Two of the nation's major gun owner associations criticized the ruling.
"I don't think the court gets it at all,' said Larry Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America. 'The court neglected to mention self-defense when discussing legitimate uses of guns'. Andrew Arulanandam, a spokesman for the National Rifle Assn., said the group has taken the position since its founding in 1871 that the 2nd Amendment gives individuals a right to possess guns. 'We will continue to maintain that position as long as we are around', he added."
Gun advocacy groups, such as the super-patriot "Keep and Bear Arms", drafted a challenge to this ruling and appealed the decision to the Supreme Court.
NEWS BRIEF: "Silveira v. Lockyer is Going to the Supreme Court!", Keep and Bear Arms, May 6, 2003 - http://keepandbeararms.com/Silveira/enbanc.asp
"Today is the day many of us have been waiting for. The 9th Circuit Court refused the request for an en banc (full court) rehearing of the Silveira v. Lockyer lawsuit. This was highly predictable. But the order denying the en banc hearing is far better than any of us predicted! SIX judges dissented -- and ALL OF THEM did so based on their correct interpretation of the Second Amendment as an INDIVIDUAL RIGHT!! This is the liberal 9th Circuit Court. Furthermore, one of the dissenting judges (Kleinfeld) offered an elaborate, detailed analysis of the Second Amendment that contains six sections, 114 footnotes and leaves virtually no stone unturned -- in defense of the Truth about the right of the people to keep and bear arms!!" [Emphasis was in the original]
The rest of this article is very upbeat about their chances of getting the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn this terrible decision by the 9th Circuit Court, thus reaffirming our Second Amendment Constitutional rights to own and bear arms. Imagine their terrible disgust this December 1, just past.
NEWS BRIEF: "Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Second Amendment Case: Silveira v. Lockyer Petition for Writ of Certiorari Denied", Keep and Bear Arms, December 1, 2003 - http://keepandbeararms.com/Silveira/denied.asp
"The U.S. Supreme Court has denied Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the Silveira v. Lockyer Second Amendment lawsuit. As of this publication, the Silveira Supreme Court docket website was not yet updated, but the Supreme Court's order page for December 1st lists the case as denied, without comment."
You may see the single-line entry for yourself. This entry is on page 5, the first line under the heading, "Certiorari Denied". The line reads:
"03-51 SILVEIRA, SEAN, ET AL. V. LOCKYER, ATT'Y GEN. OF CA"
Without fanfare, and certainly without any publicity, the U.S. Supreme Court silently gutted the Second Amendment! At this point, you may argue that, when the Supreme Court upheld the ruling of the 9th Circuit Court, that ruling did not become the "Law of the Land". You are right -- partially. I phoned a subscriber who is a practicing attorney, to ask him what the ramifications might be flowing from this ruling. After expressing dismay and disgust, and after wondering why he had heard nothing about this ruling within his legal circles, he offered these facts:
Point #1 -- Only the states covered by the 9th Circuit Court are immediately affected. For these states, this ruling immediately becomes the "Law of the Land". You can read all the states covered by the Ninth Circuit Court, or you can see these states on a colored map. For the citizens of these states, this ruling that individuals do not possess a Constitutional Right under the Second Amendment to own and bear arms is now the "Law of the Land".
Point # -- For the remaining part of the country, this ruling does not immediately apply; however, this ruling has now become "precedent" for any future litigation. In other words, any state court -- probably the Supreme Court of that state or one of the other 10 Circuit Courts -- could rule that this Ninth Circuit Court ruling is now the "Law of the Land" for their jurisdiction.
In other words, the stage is now set for the remaining parts of the country to begin falling like dominoes before an activist Judiciary! Since President Franklin D. Roosevelt became so angry with the Supreme Court for ruling that key sections of his "New Deal" were unconstitutional, the Illuminati has quietly set about to bring in judges fully in sync with the New World Order Plan!
Our politicians have long preferred to allow the Judiciary to make the really tough decisions that will move America into the New World Order. Why is this the case? Too many people have adopted the belief that we can do nothing to affect decisions of the Court, since the judges have lifetime positions. No judge making a controversial decision will have to face the electorate in 2-6 years! Thus, the really tough decisions have been left to a deliberately active Judiciary, operating under the principle that the Constitution is a "living document" to be interpreted liberally.
In closing this section, we want to allow several key individuals to have the last word on the importance of this terrible ruling:
Dissent by Judge Pregerson, Ninth Circuit Court -- "...the panel misses the mark by interpreting the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms as a collective right, rather than as an individual right. Because the panel's decision abrogates a constitutional right, this case should have been reheard en banc [full court]."
Dissent by Judge Kozinski, Ninth Circuit Court - "It is wrong to use some constitutional provisions as springboards for major social change while treating others like senile relatives to be cooped up in a nursing home until they quit annoying us. As guardians of the Constitution, we must be consistent in interpreting its provisions. If we adopt a jurisprudence sympathetic to individual rights, we must give broad compass to all constitutional provisions that protect individuals from tyranny … The able judges of the panel majority are usually very sympathetic to individual rights, but they have succumbed to the temptation to pick and choose. Had they brought the same generous approach to the Second Amendment that they routinely bring to the First, Fourth and selected portions of the Fifth, they would have had no trouble finding an individual right to bear arms." [http://keepandbeararms.com/Silveira/enbanc.asp)
After Judge Kozinski finishes with his statement, above, he then launches into a history lesson that Cutting Edge has been teaching for over 10 years, and one that Americans had been learn in a hurry, before our Illuminist leaders tighten the noose once and for all around our collective necks. Listen to Judge Kozinksi's lesson in history: (We shall elaborate on this history of gun control ramifications in Part 2)
"The majority falls prey to the delusion-popular in some circles-that
ordinary people are too careless and stupid to own guns, and we would be far
better off leaving all weapons in the hands of professionals on the government
payroll. But the simple truth-born of experience-is that tyranny thrives best
where government need not fear the wrath of an armed people … All too many
of the other great tragedies of history-Stalin's atrocities, the killing fields
of Cambodia, the Holocaust, to name but a few-were perpetrated by armed troops
against unarmed populations. Many could well have been avoided or mitigated,
had the perpetrators known their intended victims were equipped with a rifle
and twenty bullets apiece, as the Militia Act required here. See Kleinfeld Dissent
at 5997-99. If a few hundred Jewish fighters in the Warsaw Ghetto could hold
off the Wehrmacht for almost a month with only a handful of weapons, six million
Jews armed with rifles could not so easily have been herded into cattle cars.
"My excellent colleagues have forgotten these bitter lessons of history.
The prospect of tyranny may not grab the headlines the way vivid stories of
gun crime routinely do. But few saw the Third Reich coming until it was too
late. The Second Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally
rare circumstances where all other rights have failed ... However improbable
these contingencies may seem today, facing them unprepared is a mistake a free
people get to make only once … Fortunately, the Framers were wise enough
to entrench the right of the people to keep and bear arms within our constitutional
structure. The purpose and importance of that right was still fresh in their
minds, and they spelled it out clearly so it would not be forgotten. Despite
the panel's mighty struggle to erase these words, they remain, and the people
themselves can read what they say plainly enough:
'A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed'." [Ibid.]
CONCLUSION
Now that we have provided the facts of this case, let us now move on to Part 2, where we shall describe in detail the historic record of what has happened when a people have allowed their government to take away their guns. You will discover, to your horror, that this good Judge Kozinski was entirely correct in his recollection of history.
However, you will discover that his words -- as somber as they are -- really understate the enormity of the crimes committed against a people whose government confiscated their guns. Once you see the statistics, you will understand the how deeply in trouble America is today. Once every state in the Union has sided with the legal precedent -- created by the Ninth Circuit Decision plus the refusal of the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case -- then the laws will have changed, so that it will be illegal for an individual citizen to own and bear a gun.
The nation at this point will then await the planned disasters of the Final Birth Pangs War, which includes massive and violent uprising within our cities. When the rioting gets underway, probably after the next terrorist attack in one or more cities, and the nation does not have the National Guard to call upon to restore order, the authority governing the United States at that time will turn to the United Nations for foreign troops to restore order.
At this point, the U.S. will revert to the five (5) military patrol zones, as we detail in NEWS1291. We believe that foreign troops will likely be the ones going house-to-house, confiscating the guns and killing their owners if they resist.
This major ruling has paved the way. We seem to be getting closer to that Secret Police dictatorship about which we have written for so long. Now, let us go on to Part 2, where we review some very somber history. This article does prove one point that Cutting Edge has been teaching for years: the Illuminati does have a "Contract On America"!
Are you spiritually ready? Is your family? Are you adequately protecting your loved ones? This is the reason for this ministry, to enable you to first understand the peril facing you, and then help you develop strategies to warn and protect your loved ones. Once you have been thoroughly trained, you can also use your knowledge as a means to open the door of discussion with an unsaved person. I have been able to use it many times, and have seen people come to Jesus Christ as a result. These perilous times are also a time when we can reach many souls for Jesus Christ, making an eternal difference.
If you have accepted Jesus Christ as your personal Savior, but have been very lukewarm in your spiritual walk with Him, you need to immediately ask Him for forgiveness and for renewal. He will instantly forgive you, and fill your heart with the joy of the Holy Spirit. Then, you need to begin a daily walk of prayer and personal Bible Study.
If you have never accepted Jesus Christ as Savior, but have come to realize His reality and the approaching End of the Age, and want to accept His FREE Gift of Eternal Life, you can also do so now, in the privacy of your home. Once you accept Him as Savior, you are spiritually Born Again, and are as assured of Heaven as if you were already there. Then, you can rest assured that the Kingdom of Antichrist will not touch you spiritually.
If you would like to become Born Again, turn to our Salvation Page now.
We hope you have been blessed by this ministry, which seeks to educate and warn people, so that they can see the coming New World Order -- Kingdom of Antichrist -- in their daily news.
Finally, we would love to hear from you.
You can contact us by mail or email.
God bless you.
