On August 17, 1998, President Clinton kicked off this current round of values-conditioning using this Six Step Attitudinal Change Plan , and yes, he knew exactly what he was doing and the role he was playing.  Let us review now Clinton's actions in line with each of these six steps.

1. Some practice so offensive that it can scarcely be discussed in public is advocated by a RESPECTED expert in a RESPECTED forum. -- Certainly, no practice has been so despised in the legal arena as Perjury.  As a result, if any other citizen were to admit they had perjured themselves, they would immediately be sentenced to jail, with incarceration beginning immediately.  President Clinton admitted that he had perjured himself in the Paula Jones' deposition, but never did say he was willing to admit that he should have to suffer the same penalties as would be meted out to any other American citizen.  Instead of going directly to Jail, without passing Go, the President went out on the campaign circuit.  The office of the President is the "respected forum" and Clinton is the "respected expert".

2. At first, the public is shocked, then outraged. -- Most of the public was shocked by the President's lying under oath, and his lying directly to the American public.  Many of the President's own supporters voiced shock and even outrage over the fact that the President had lied both to the people and directly to them.  Liberal Democrat Senator Diane Feinstein, California, issued a statement the very next day voicing her shock and outrage that the President had lied.  However, the total amount of American outrage was limited in both scope and in time, as polls were quickly ushered out that seemed to show a whopping 67% Presidential Approval Rating.  Thus, the real story of the hour was that about 50% of the American people were not outraged at all, and were willing to overlook seemingly anything as long as the economy was performing fine and as long as Clinton enunciated the Liberal, Government-do-everything programs near and dear to their hearts.  The Illuminati was certainly watching this development closely, as it signaled that the American people were now sufficiently cut off from their traditional Christian roots that they would accept the alternative program waiting in the wings -- the New World Order Kingdom of Antichrist.

3. But, the VERY FACT that such a thing could be publicly debated becomes the SUBJECT of the debate. Almost immediately, the Democrats in Congress began to shift the focus of the debate, exactly in accordance with this Step 3.  The Democrats began the mantra that, while the President acted reprehensibly in committing perjury, that act was not enough to impeach him.  The phrase they coined was that perjury was not "an impeachable offense", that it did not reach to the level envisioned by the Founding Fathers of "high crimes and misdemeanors".  They even paraded a long line of Liberal lawyers and even more Liberal professors of the law to repeat this mantra, using legal sounding language to convince a gullible American electorate.  Just as Bresnahan pointed out in his book, "Cover Up:  The Art and Science of Political Deception", one of Clinton's favorite tactics is to parade a bunch of "experts" in front of the camera that would take his line of defense.  Bresnahan called the tactic, "My Experts Are Better Than Your Experts".  He was right on the money, and we saw it in great detail immediately following the President's August 17 speech.

Further, Bresnahan notes that President Clinton is a great admirer of Adolf Hitler, especially his political skills.  Therefore, it is worth noting, at this point, that Hitler used this tactic of employing experts to advance his cause, during 1933, when he was marshalling his forces to institute his planned dictatorship.  Listen:  "... the Nazis attracted considerable support from leading German professors:  for example, 960 prominent German educators signed a public vow to support Adolf Hitler and the Nazi regime, which was published in the fall of 1933." ["The Nazi Doctors", Robert Jay Lifton, p. 37]

However, the last time I checked, Perjury is classified as a Felony.  Certainly, no truthful Constitutional scholar would ever try to defend the ludicrous position that a Felony did not reach the level envisioned by our Founding Fathers of "high crimes".  A Felony is certainly a "High Crime", let alone a Misdemeanor.  But, like Adolf Hitler before him [whom Clinton admires for his political savvy], Clinton understood the propaganda maxim that "truth is not what is; truth is what people perceive it to be".  Too many American people proved too eager to be convinced by this legal stupidity that a Felony does not constitute grounds for impeachment, that Clinton began slipping off the hook, even as the House of Representatives was voting to consider Impeachment.

4. In the debate, sheer repetition of the shocking subject gradually dulls its effect. Once again, the Mass Media fulfilled its function as the facilitator of this most important step of providing "sheer repetition".  However, the time line to achieve this conditioning must have been really short, because within a couple of weeks of non-stop coverage of this affair, they rushed polls into existence that asked the people if they were sick and tired of all this coverage of something which is nothing more than a sexual escapade.  Since a pollster can get the result for which he is looking by the way he phrases the question, they were easily able to get the results they wanted.  Immediately, we were informed that the American people were sick and tired of all this nonsense and wanted the President off the legal hook.  The debate over impeachment was never quite the same again.

5. People then are no longer shocked. The Democrats in Congress and Liberals in Academia ensured that the people would no longer be shocked over the fact that the President committed perjury.  They accomplished this feat in no small part because they continued the process of shifting the blame for the whole mess on to Independent Counsel, Ken Starr.  In the days and weeks following August 17, this tactic was utilized daily, to drum this lie into the brains of the American people.  Once again, too many Americans seemed too willing to not think at all, just as the Illuminati wanted them to.  Listen to the appropriate quote from New Age author, Bill Cooper, writing in his book, "Behold A Pale Horse".

"This public behavior is surrender born of fear, laziness, and expediency.  It is the basis of the welfare state as a strategic weapon, useful against a disgusting public." [p. 60]  I sit amazed at the fact that 86% of all blacks support Clinton, even though he has acted so abominably.  Even black Christian churches and their clergy offer Clinton their enthusiastic and bottomless support, even after all the immorality of which he is guilty. Where is their discernment, I ask?  How can the proud, independent black leadership of Martin Luther King be replaced by the "suck-up-to-the-Federal Government" mentality of Jessie Jackson?  Of course, understanding that Jessie Jackson is a member of the CFR, and therefore, part of the New World Order Plan, tells me all I need to know.  I warn all black folks that the very Democrat politicians whom you support in every election, no matter what they do in office, or what their qualifications might be, are the very people whom this sentence describes, above:  they think you are disgusting, and they look upon the Welfare State as a useful "strategic weapon" to use against you for the express purpose of getting you to surrender to their dictatorial state.

6. No longer outraged, people begin to argue for positions to moderate the extreme; or, they accept the premise, challenging, instead, the means to ACHIEVE it. -- Once polls began to show that Americans were not outraged by the behavior of President Clinton, I immediately began to look for a proposal to come forth that would let the President off the hook in some legal manner. And, I did not have to wait long.  Soon, the proposal came forth, that the Congress "censure" President Clinton rather than impeach him.  As soon as this proposal was made public, it seemed that many Democrat Congressmen took up the mantra.  At the Starr hearing on November 19, 1998, I was shocked when Congressman Shumer of New York, [Senator-elect], stated boldly that, yes, the President had lied under oath, but so what?  Several other Congressmen took up this line of reasoning all throughout the rest of the day.

Then, on November 20, 1998, Starr's ethics advisor, Sam Dash, resigned in protest, alleging that Starr had stepped out of bounds of the Independent Counsel's mandate.  Dash alleged that Starr had illegally become an advocate for impeachment rather than simply being a reporter to the Congress.  As soon as I learned that Dash was a Liberal Democrat who had served as Democrat Counsel during the Impeachment hearings of President Nixon, all sorts of red lights began to flash in my head.  This was a set-up!  The Democrats had been arguing that Starr had overstepped the bounds of Independent Counsel all day long when they questioned, or lectured, Starr.  Now, I know what they were up to; they were preparing the American people to accept this premise that would be "confirmed" the very next day by Dash's resignation!  Later on the night of the 20th, NBC News reported that one of their reporters had been told by a White House staffer that someone from Starr's office was going to defect!  Bingo!  Sam Dash was a disaster waiting to happen, and Starr should have known it.

Then, Starr himself uttered the statement that confirmed Dash's allegations!  He was asked for his reaction to Dash's resignation and his allegation that Starr had overstepped the bounds of Independent Counsel, and had become a party line advocate for impeachment.  Starr said that he highly admired Dash, and loved him, but he disagreed that he had stepped over any bounds.  But, since he loved and admired Dash, too many Americans will conclude that Dash must have been right, for he must possess the legal acumen that would cause Starr to admire him; additionally, this legal acumen was what was causing Dash to resign in protest.  In other words, Starr himself confirmed the allegations that he had overstepped the boundary of Independent Counsel, and had become the party hack of which he has been repeatedly accused of being, simply out to "get" Clinton.

Further, how could anyone who had a pivotal role in the Congressional railroading of President Nixon ever be trusted to advise anyone else on "ethics"?  I was there, folks, in 1973, avidly following the daily proceedings.  The Democrats were guilty of everything they are now whining that the Republicans are supposedly doing to President Clinton.  They deliberately kept widening the impeachment probe; they kept calling witnesses even though they could establish no reason to do so; the votes were all along part lines, as the majority Democrats kept looking under every rock until they found the one witness who told them that the White House had a taping system that recorded the most sensitive conversations.  Even Hillary Rodham [now Clinton] was in on the act as counsel for the Democrats; she argued that President Nixon did not even deserve counsel before the committee!  But, oh boy, when Bill Clinton testified for the grand jury, he delayed until Starr agreed to let him be represented by counsel.

I believe that Ken Starr is a nice lawyer and judge who is controlled by President Clinton.  I have believed this from the beginning, and believe it now even more now after listening to his testimony.  In this era of sound-bytes for television, Starr and his media advisors should have prepared his 2-hour testimony in such a way that the core message would have been delivered in carefully prepared sound-bytes that the TV networks would have seized upon for the evening news.  He did not do this, even though he was essentially reading, word for word, from his prepared text.  However, he did deliver a bombshell of a sound-byte when he stated that he was "exonerating the President from Whitewater, File-gate, and Travel-gate".  When I heard him say that, I gasped.  I knew that the TV networks would likely pick up the words, "exonerate the President" and play them over and over.  Further, I knew that most Americans would likely hear only those words, "exonerate the President".

After the clear culpability of President and Hillary Clinton on so many matters, I was horrified to realize that this whole "investigation" was likely the largest whitewash in American history .  Just as in the Mob, a lot of the little people will be convicted, letting the biggest fish  swim away.  Then, after all the storm is passed, Clinton will fully pardon the little fish that did get caught, and the American people will just yawn in boredom for a few moments and then turn back to watching their investment portfolios.

By now, it should be very clear that this President is going to be allowed to walk free from the felony of Perjury. When he does walk away scot-free from this felony, he will deliver a death blow to our current system of Justice.  As Marsha Clark, former prosecutor in the O. J. Simpson Murder Trial, was continuing to be interviewed following her remarks, above, she made the point that the American Judicial System cannot deliver Justice if people cannot be forced to testify truthfully.  She said that, soon, many Americans will be saying that they do not have to tell the truth if the President can be allowed to lie with impunity.  Immediately, a black columnist, Mr. Bishop, chimed in, saying, "They already are, Ms. Clark".  He said that he has been talking with inner city blacks on the street and they are saying this right now!  "Why should we worry about telling the truth in court if the President of the United States can lie and get away with it?", they are reasoning.

So, the destructive process has already begun.  Soon, some very Liberal Congressman will introduce a bill that will abolish the Perjury penalty, or at least reduce it to a misdemeanor, because he has been getting feedback from his constituents that this is what they would like.  Then, once Congress passes this bill, our American Justice system is finished, and the Illuminati will have gotten one of their most prized goals.  The Kingdom of Antichrist is incompatible with a system of justice that places such a high priority on telling the truth that it will incarcerate people who lie under oath.

Truly, this event is an End of the Age development.  President Clinton is the ultimate "Teflon" President.  He is powerful and he seems to be supernaturally protected.  Actually, we are seeing the working out of a plan in which both Democrats and Republicans are an integral part, to produce a President that will be exonerated of all wrong-doing, even though people know, in their inner hearts, that he is "guilty as charged".  The working out of this plan is designed to accomplish the following goals:

1) To bring down the American Justice System, and its emphasis upon telling the truth under oath

2) To further harden the hearts of the American people to all forms of wrong doing, especially sexual misconduct

3)  To further strengthen President Clinton politically.  Just as a bone that has been broken and then healed, is stronger than it was before the break, so will Clinton be stronger after he has been "exonerated" from all these investigations.

4)  Thus, a stronger Liberal Democrat President would then be able to further change the American system of government and to facilitate further changes in values and attitudes amongst Americans, to further move us into the Satanic values of Antichrist.  Americans are very close to this Satanic attitude now.  Remember what Satanic values are?  Satanists teach indulgence in the following areas:  "Greed, Pride, Envy, Anger, Gluttony, Lust, and Sloth " ["Satanic Bible", by Anton LaVey, p. 46].  Haven't I just listed the main attributes of Americans today?  Haven't I just listed the content of most TV commercials and of most TV shows today?  Americans are more Satanic today in their personal values and attitudes than they would like to think.  You do not have to be an active Satanist, and a member of a coven, to be Satanic.  You just have to order your life with the above values.

Consider the fact that no President in history has ever lied to the American people as often as has Bill Clinton, nor as boldly, nor as defiantly.  Yet, for all that, Clinton remains one of the most popular Presidents, if you can believe the polls.  Certainly, the recent elections showed that almost half the American people cast their votes for candidates who supported the President.  How can Clinton get away with this unprecedented level of lying?  Once you understand how completely the American electorate has changed, in moving away from any moorings to the Christian ethic, then you can understand that they would be susceptible to the "principles of control" enunciated by the Satanist.  What does the Satanist believe about controlling people?  Consider their maxim:  You control people most effectively by boldly, and continuously, lying to them.  Since we have proven that Bill and Hillary Clinton are practicing Illuminist witches, you can understand how they can lie, lie, and lie some more and still remain so popular!

We need to close on a Biblical note, for our own sanity and direction.  Rather than believing in the New Age, Clinton assertion that "truth is what you want it to be", the Bible states that truth is found in accepting the facts, especially the fact of Jesus Christ and His Salvation Plan.  Behind all of human history, God stands, noting the direction a nation is taking, and planning the appropriate judgment.  We would do well to note the Biblical mandate, "Blessed is the nation whose God is the LORD" [Psalm 33:12]. 

Conversely, cursed is the nation who has forsaken their God!  Americans today have fallen into the same type of rebellion of which the Jews were guilty in 586 B.C., just before God brought down their most prosperous nation in history in judgment by bringing in the King of Babylon to militarily destroy them.  God complained that the Jews of that day had first refused His truth, and then deliberately closed their ears to it any longer.  Listen to God's words and then realize Americans are doing exactly the same thing today. 

"... Prophesy not unto us right things, speak unto us smooth things, prophesy deceits: Get you out of the way, turn aside out of the path, cause the Holy One of Israel to cease from before us."  [Isaiah 30:10-11].  I love the way the Amplified Commentary translates this verse.  "Speak to us smooth things, prophesy deceitful illusions.  Get out of the true way, turn aside our of the path, cease holding up before us the Holy One of Israel."  Then, God tells them, in verses 12-17, how He is going to judge them by totally destroying their most prosperous nation.  God ends His pronouncement of judgment with the somber words, "For the Lord is a God of judgment [justice]". [verse 18]