Title: U.N.
OFFICIAL PROPOSES ALL NATIONS GIVE UP THEIR NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND OTHER WEAPONS
OF MASS DESTRUCTION! Title: U.N.
OFFICIAL PROPOSES ALL NATIONS GIVE UP THEIR NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND OTHER WEAPONS
OF MASS DESTRUCTION!
|
Resources to aid your Understanding
|
|
|
Learn how to protect yourself, your loved ones!
Stand by for insights so startling you will never look at the news the same way again.
YOU ARE NOW ON
THE CUTTING EDGE
Most people have no idea that the United Nations was originally created with Satanic, Illuminist spiritual values in mind! In fact, the U.N. was originally created as the infant global government that would "grow up" one day, achieve significant powers, and be ready for "The Christ" to inherit this political and spiritual power. Let us go to one of the most powerful of all New World Order leaders, Alice A. Bailey, the global Director of the House of Theosophy from 1919-1954 when she died. Bailey admits that her books are "channeled" by Master D. K., one of the more powerful demons in the Hierarchy. Listen to Bailey/Master D.K. describe the original purpose of the United Nations:
"For the first time in human history, the love of God was embodied in a man, and Christ inaugurated the era of love. That expression of divine love is still in the making; the world is not yet full of love and few there are that understand the true meaning of the word. But -- speaking symbolically -- when the United Nations has emerged into factual and actual power, the welfare of the world will then be assured ... Those are the things which the love of God in Christ expressed and those are the things which we are attempting to do on a vast scale ...such is the potency of the awakened spirit of man. These are the things which the Hierarchy, in its already successful procedures, is aiding and will continue to aid." ["The Externalisation of the Hierarchy", Alice Bailey, p. 603]
NOTE: The "Hierarchy" referred to here is that supernatural group of "Ascended Masters" led by Sanat Kumura (Satan).
Notice that Bailey begins this statement by invoking the memory of Jesus Christ, who was embodied in a man for the first time in human history so He could inaugurate the era of love. Occultists recognize Jesus the Christ as an Avatar (World Teacher), one with specially developed spiritual powers who comes into world history at a particular moment to a particular people, to lead that people to a higher level of spiritual consciousness. Jesus was such an Avatar to the Jews, while Buddha was a similar Avatar to the Oriental, and Mohammed a similar avatar to the Arab world. Thus, Jesus is recognized as an Avatar no better than, and no less than, Buddha and Mohammed!
However, we cannot leave this discussion before recognizing that Master D.K. -- channeling through Alice Bailey -- says that the work of Love which Jesus the Christ started is not finished! Finishing this work of Love is the task before the Hierarchy today and is to be accomplished by the current work of the "Illumined Ones" -- the Illuminati.
Elsewhere, Bailey states that the timing of establishment of the United Nations shows it occult roots.
"... a foundation could be created for the far more difficult international conference to be held in San Francisco at the time of the Wesak, the Full Moon of the Buddha, Not for nothing is this conference being held during the five days of the Wesak Full Moon. It will be a time of supreme difficulty, in which the Forces of Light will face what I call 'the forces of selfishness and separativeness'. Subjectively speaking, the conference will be under the direct influence of the Hierarchy." [Ibid., p. 450]
Thus, even though the United Nations that was founded in April - June, 1945 -- during the Buddhist Wesak period -- was a weak, divisive, powerless organization, that is not the end result the Illuminati has in mind. At the end of the age, just before Antichrist arises, the United Nations will be THE only government in the world possessing Sovereignty. At this point, all national governments will have surrendered their national sovereignty.
One can see this matter of sovereignty most clearly in the matter of military armaments. At the end, the U.N. is expected to be the only government possessing deadly military force. Let us examine the wording of their plan regarding nuclear weapons, written in 1945.
"The Atomic bomb does not belong to the three nations who perfected it and who own its secrets at present -- the United States, Great Britain, and Canada. It belongs to the United Nations for use ... or threatened use when aggressive action on the part of any nation rears its ugly head." [Ibid., p. 548]
Therefore, the plan is for the United Nations to use nuclear weapons against any nation or organization who threatens its global power; but, of course, the U.N. cannot use nuclear war against another nation unless it is the only government in the world who possesses nuclear weapons! This argument is essentially the same as for national Gun Control. Only after a government disarms its citizenry can it impose a dictatorship!
Therefore, if we are getting close to the time when all nations will give up their nuclear weapons to the United Nations, we should expect to hear such proposals from prominent politicans and/or officials right now. Thus, you will understand my interest in the following article, carried in Daily News Updates 2/16/2004.
NEWS BRIEF: "Nukes bad in every hand, even if it’s the US", The International News - Internet Edition, 2/16/2004
"Mohammad ElBaradei, the Director General of the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), has finally said something that needed to be said.
This is what he said in a recent opinion article in the New York Times: 'The
world must drop the idea that nuclear weapons are fine in the hands of some
countries and bad in the hands of others ... We must abandon the unworkable
notion that it is morally reprehensible for some countries to pursue weapons
of mass destruction yet morally acceptable for others to rely on them for security
— and indeed to continue to refine their capacities and postulate plans
for their use'."
"It doesn’t require much imagination to conclude that it is the US that is seeking to refine its capacity to produce weapons of mass destruction and postulate plans for their use to enhance security. The US alone has plans to make mini-nukes. In fact, US planners toyed with the idea of using small nuclear bombs both in Afghanistan and Iraq against alleged terrorists. That shouldn’t surprise anyone because the US is the only country in the world’s history to have bombed another nation, in this case Japan, with an atomic bomb. Having done it once without facing any accountability, the US could use nuclear weapons again and justify it by blaming the victim as a rogue or terrorist state."
This view is prevalent amongst many nations today. How dare the U.S. unilaterally take upon itself the task of deciding which nations are to be classified as "rogue nations" or "axis of evil" nations, when only the U.S. has ever used atomic weapons upon anyone? Neither Iraq, nor Iran, nor North Korea has ever used nuclear weapons upon anyone. Nor China nor Russia, for that matter. Only the U.S. has ever used nuclear weapons upon a civilian population! That is the view the rest of the world toward us.
Of course, the fact that our trumpeting of WMD in Iraq has turned into empty misrepresentations does not enhance our reputation in the minds of foreign peoples!
It is in this vein that this U.N. official continued:
"As ElBaradei pointed out, nuclear weapons are destructive and, therefore, unacceptable. Weapons of mass destruction are bad in every hand, whether American, Russian, Pakistani, Indian, Iraqi or Israeli. The world should declare that possession of such weapons was immoral for every nation, including those claiming to be more civilized and democratic. President George W Bush’s 'axis of evil' nations including Iran, Iraq and North Korea were faulted for pursuing weapons of mass destruction, and then sanctioned and condemned. It was selective morality because the US president made no mention of Israel, which too has vigorously pursued weapons of mass destruction. If Iran or Iraq were trying to develop nuclear weapons it was for no other reason but to bolster their defence against a nuclearised Israel. Curbs against Israeli nuclear programme would have assured both Iran and Iraq and enabled the international community to prevail upon them to abandon their nuclear ambitions. Nothing was done to stop Israel from acquiring and producing weapons of mass destruction. In fact, Israel was hailed for bombing Iraq’s nuclear assets. As a consequence, Iran and Iraq tried not only to outdo each other but also match Israel in their pursuit of weapons of mass destruction." [Ibid.]
As our conflict with North Korea has heated up, that country has made the point that Saddam was invaded and his country destroyed simply because the U.N. Inspectors confirmed before the invasion that he had no WMD. The North Koreans insist that, had Saddam really possessed WMD with the means to deliver them, President Bush would never have dared attack. Therefore, North Korea's greatest security lies in developing her own WMD to counter the U.S. threat. As Iran and other nations adopt this same mindset, the world becomes increasingly unstable! This is the line the U.N. is propagating here.
Now, back to the U.N.'s ElBaradei, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA):
"In our part of the world, Pakistan might not have launched its costly nuclear programme had India refrained from producing an atomic bomb. The nuclear arms race between the two hostile neighbours that started in the 1970s has continued to this day, taking its toll in terms of lopsided spending on defence at the cost of the neglected social sectors. Like Pakistan, other nations also began spending precious resources on nuclear programmes out of fear of their powerful nuclearised neighbours." [Ibid.]
Now that the problem has been sufficiently defined, ElBaradei weighs in with his solution:
"The perfect solution to the problem of the weapons of mass destruction would be to destroy every single weapon that has been manufactured in our unstable world. The world won’t become safer if Iraq’s non-existent weapons of mass destruction are found and destroyed. And the world would still be a dangerous place if Pakistan’s nuclear programme is rolled back, put under UN control or forced open to inspections by the IAEA experts. The US would never give up those weapons of mass destruction or allow other nations to overtake it by making better atomic bombs because that would threaten its global supremacy and challenge its superpower status. Other nuclear powers that have acquired weapons of mass destruction too would like to attain unchallenged power to bully smaller nations. In the process, the world would continue to suffer instability and, in the words of ElBaradei, face threats of nuclear destruction."
Notice that ElBaradei mentions "U.N. control" as he talks about Pakistan's development of nuclear weapons; however, he stops short of boldly advocating U.N. control over all WMD, including the American arsenal, although that is the ultimate goal. No leader of the United States would ever be able to transfer its weapons to the United Nations until a devastating World War III has been fought, with dire consequences. But, then, as the Antichrist comes striding through the smoke and dust of that war, the devastation will be so great that he will find great willingness on the part of every nation to give their entire military, and its WMD stocks, to the United Nations.
At this point, Antichrist will govern the only sovereign government in the world, and will control the only stock of WMD -- all in the name of "peace and safety", don't you know? Promising great peace because of his benevolent nature, Antichrist will then set in motion events which will fulfill End of the Age prophecy, one of which is:
"... by peace shall destroy many ..." [Dan 8:25]
Therefore, this proposal represents Step 1 of the Six Step Attitudinal Change Plan on this subject [Read NEWS1055]. However, the fact we are close enough for the controversial subject to begin tells us of the lateness of the prophetic hour! Are you spiritually ready? Is your family? Are you adequately protecting your loved ones? This is the reason for this ministry, to enable you to first understand the peril facing you, and then help you develop strategies to warn and protect your loved ones. Once you have been thoroughly trained, you can also use your knowledge as a means to open the door of discussion with an unsaved person. I have been able to use it many times, and have seen people come to Jesus Christ as a result. These perilous times are also a time when we can reach many souls for Jesus Christ, making an eternal difference.
If you have accepted Jesus Christ as your personal Savior, but have been very lukewarm in your spiritual walk with Him, you need to immediately ask Him for forgiveness and for renewal. He will instantly forgive you, and fill your heart with the joy of the Holy Spirit. Then, you need to begin a daily walk of prayer and personal Bible Study.
If you have never accepted Jesus Christ as Savior, but have come to realize His reality and the approaching End of the Age, and want to accept His FREE Gift of Eternal Life, you can also do so now, in the privacy of your home. Once you accept Him as Savior, you are spiritually Born Again, and are as assured of Heaven as if you were already there. Then, you can rest assured that the Kingdom of Antichrist will not touch you spiritually.
If you would like to become Born Again, turn to our Salvation Page now.
We hope you have been blessed by this ministry, which seeks to educate and warn people, so that they can see the coming New World Order -- Kingdom of Antichrist -- in their daily news.
Finally, we would love to hear from you.
You can contact us by mail or email.
God bless you.
